- Select items
- Put in a folder
- Select folder (otherwise you may zip the wrong folder)
- Open file menu (the gear at the top of the window)
- Select COMPRESS or archive
- Sit back and feel smug
We're all just figuring it out. Follow me as I learn how to use Photoshop Elements.
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Zip it Up-Making a Zip File on the Mac
Making a zip file on the Mac is just too easy.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Lighting
Lighting gives life to artwork. So I've been playing around with it. I'm amzaed what a drastic difference light settings can do to a work.
Check out->FILTER->RENDER->PHOTO FILTER. Then have fun playing around with lighting effects. I first discovered this filter while reading a tutorial by photographer, James Neeley. Here's the link:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jpn/2232926764
For a full list of his tutorials go here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jpn/sets/72157603800513547/
I just finished making a banner for my site. Everyone seems to have one. I'll show you some different looks you can get with the filter using my banner as an example.
![]() | ||||||||
| Green Texture Channel |
![]() | |||||||||
| Finished Banner |
![]() | ||||||||||||
| Omni light to spotlight eagle |
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Toulouse Lautrec and the Rubber Stamp
I spent the afternoon at the art gallery today. http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_the_modern_woman.html
It was interesting to see sketches. Amazing what Seaurat could do with Charcol. Truly amazing actually. I was surprised to find out that one painter actually sketched on cardboard! My companion remarked that he didn't know that cardboard was even invented in the late 1800's. One imagines the painter, desparately picking the cardboard out of the bin and grabbing charcol from the stove to create a minor masterpiece. Now that's broke! Just imagine what they might of done with modern technology and some cash.
Flash forward a hundred years or so. Here's what they could have done.
Yes, rubber stamps of famous paintings. I bought two, the one you see and a Gauguin stamp. It was either that or the art nouveau coasters. I am somewhat ashamed of myself. At the time it seemed like a good idea. It wasn't until I actually was inking the stamps that I felt a little uneasy about it. I blame the Musee d' Orsay. They made the stamps. I'm still not too sure what to think.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Henri_de_Toulouse-Lautrec_032.jpg
Check out the original.
It was interesting to see sketches. Amazing what Seaurat could do with Charcol. Truly amazing actually. I was surprised to find out that one painter actually sketched on cardboard! My companion remarked that he didn't know that cardboard was even invented in the late 1800's. One imagines the painter, desparately picking the cardboard out of the bin and grabbing charcol from the stove to create a minor masterpiece. Now that's broke! Just imagine what they might of done with modern technology and some cash.
Flash forward a hundred years or so. Here's what they could have done.
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © Toulouse Lautrec (not anymore) |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Henri_de_Toulouse-Lautrec_032.jpg
Check out the original.
Monday, August 9, 2010
Now for Something Completely New
I guess you're admiring my stunninly beautiful header right now. I didn't make it. The header is from
Cute and Cool Blog Stuff
http://blo64rt.blogspot.com/
They have some nice backgrounds and headers. Also some info on installing them. There are also some tutorials for PSP
Cute and Cool Blog Stuff
http://blo64rt.blogspot.com/
They have some nice backgrounds and headers. Also some info on installing them. There are also some tutorials for PSP
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Grunge and the Rain
Grunge and rainy days seem to go together. Grunge is organic in the Pacific Northwest. Maybe it's the mold or maybe it's the pattern of rain dripping down concrete. Maybe it harks back to childhood when I rubbed away the condensation on my window to see outside. Then thinking, "Hey, cool background".
Okay. I was a weird kid.
Surfing the web today I came across a site that had grunge, patterned brushes. Then a nice tutorial about using them.
These are great! I had lots of fun playing around with them.
![]() |
| ©2010 NeonSun Studios |
I used 3 different brushes, the dots, the plaid and the flowers. Because they're brushes a lot of different adjustments from the brush pallette can be used. Very adaptable.
If you're looking for some barbed wire to go with your grunge flowers then here's a link to another page on the site.
Or if you are romantically inclined, scroll down the page for a grunge hearts overlay.
So you can explore the site and links. The best way to check out what's on offer is to go to her site at DeviantArt.
For some grunge fonts to go with your art you can head over here.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Idiotic Gadgets
As you may or may not of noticed I made a promise to showcase idiotic gadgets on my blog. Last month it was smiling dogs. Yes, that's why that idiotic thing is on my blog. It is a new month so I will remove the aforementioned gadget and replace it with something equally idiotic. If you have any suggestions for a gadget leave a comment.
Wow. Than was more difficult than I thought. I tried to load, 'A widget to help you decide things'. Sadly it was broken. So you'll have to decide all by yourself. Then I tried to load a compatibility widget. It can tell if you're compatible with someone by simply entering two names. A word of advice, "Don't try this woth your s/o. Luckily there is no chance of that because that widget is also broken. So what's a person to do? I did wrestle between Darth Vader or Mr. T quotes. Mr. T got knocked off the short list when the word, "sucka" didn't appear in the quotes. In the end I settled for mascots as sort of a bridge between smiling animals and Darth Vader quotes.
Wow. Than was more difficult than I thought. I tried to load, 'A widget to help you decide things'. Sadly it was broken. So you'll have to decide all by yourself. Then I tried to load a compatibility widget. It can tell if you're compatible with someone by simply entering two names. A word of advice, "Don't try this woth your s/o. Luckily there is no chance of that because that widget is also broken. So what's a person to do? I did wrestle between Darth Vader or Mr. T quotes. Mr. T got knocked off the short list when the word, "sucka" didn't appear in the quotes. In the end I settled for mascots as sort of a bridge between smiling animals and Darth Vader quotes.
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Monday, August 2, 2010
Disembodied Souls or Protecting your Work
Love is not always forever.
Friendship is not always forever.
In this age of social decay and destablized families, nothing is forever.
Except what you post on the internet. That's forever.
Bad photos of being insanely drunk, if posted on the internet are forever. So are the photos of your favourite sunset or your baby kittens. Same goes for artwork. Another truth in life is that thousands of people as I write this are right-clicking a photo or work of art. Most of them are blissfully ignorant of the fact that someone took that picture, maybe even owns (copyright) it.
So I've been checking out ways to keep that from happening. To prevent duplicating info I'm posting links. And yes, I'm tired and want to go to bed.
This link provides general information that I see often from gif layers to code to stop the dreaded right-click:
http://www.naturefocused.com/articles/image-protection.html
Elements7 has a function for attaching and/or reading digital watermarks. Though it will cost you $$$$ Pull down your filter menu and at the bottom is digimark. The company will even search the web for your watermark.
If you have a Mac you can make a © by hitting Option g
On windows I believe it is ALT 169
I also came upon a site that will check your site for stolen info or images. Also will check images you may want to buy to make sure they are not stolen. You can try before you buy:
http://www.copyscape.com/
I would be remiss in my duties if I didn't mention Creative Commons:
http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
A short note about copyrighting images. Photoshop's Bridge Program has space in the EXIF data to name copyright holders. Also use low res (72 DPI) for images on the net so they will look like crap when printed or enlarged.
If anyone knows of more tips or tricks to protect artwork please feel free to leave a comment. Or if you are shy, leave a link.
Here's a fun with photoshop ATC. Good night.
Oh and the diembodied souls. I imagine stolen images floating through time and space like disembodied souls. Go claim them.
Friendship is not always forever.
In this age of social decay and destablized families, nothing is forever.
Except what you post on the internet. That's forever.
Bad photos of being insanely drunk, if posted on the internet are forever. So are the photos of your favourite sunset or your baby kittens. Same goes for artwork. Another truth in life is that thousands of people as I write this are right-clicking a photo or work of art. Most of them are blissfully ignorant of the fact that someone took that picture, maybe even owns (copyright) it.
So I've been checking out ways to keep that from happening. To prevent duplicating info I'm posting links. And yes, I'm tired and want to go to bed.
This link provides general information that I see often from gif layers to code to stop the dreaded right-click:
http://www.naturefocused.com/articles/image-protection.html
Elements7 has a function for attaching and/or reading digital watermarks. Though it will cost you $$$$ Pull down your filter menu and at the bottom is digimark. The company will even search the web for your watermark.
If you have a Mac you can make a © by hitting Option g
On windows I believe it is ALT 169
I also came upon a site that will check your site for stolen info or images. Also will check images you may want to buy to make sure they are not stolen. You can try before you buy:
http://www.copyscape.com/
I would be remiss in my duties if I didn't mention Creative Commons:
http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses
A short note about copyrighting images. Photoshop's Bridge Program has space in the EXIF data to name copyright holders. Also use low res (72 DPI) for images on the net so they will look like crap when printed or enlarged.
If anyone knows of more tips or tricks to protect artwork please feel free to leave a comment. Or if you are shy, leave a link.
Here's a fun with photoshop ATC. Good night.
![]() |
| © 2010 NeonSun Studio |
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Snips
No, I didn't get bored with blogging and move on to something more interesting. I've been doing housekeeping on my computer. My work is essentially collage. So I'm always looking for new snips or images. All of them copyright free or free to use under a Creative Commons licence. The free to use images require me to link back to the original owner. Sometimes late at night I go looking for images and download quite a few in an evening. And sometimes I forget to type in who owns it. My advise to you, "Don't make that mistake". You will be re-searching the internet for the owners when you decide to use that image.
My housekeeping is done. Now everything is sorted nicely into colour coded folders in alphabetical order. There are a few strays. I feel like posting a note under my picture asking if anyone owns that graphic. Something like, "If this is your snip, feel free to send me a terse, yet polite email and I'll give you credit".
Sometimes I wonder about copyright. If you find an old photo at a garage sale, do you have the right to copyright it? Some of those people could be alive. I often wonder about those faces. Would that charming little child who may be in their 80's now, really be happy about a cherished memory being Zettied? Don't they own their own image?
Another thing I saw tonight was a site that sold rubberstamps claimed that the images on the stamps are copyrighted. It stated that anything made with the stamp could not be sold as it was copyrighted. Is this going too far? If I put a sticker on my work I don't have to thank the sticker company.
It is something to think about. Copyrighting old images that belong to other people or, are already published just seems wrong. When people do that we lose track of who actually created the image or its origins. What if someone copyrighted the Rosetta Stone? After all the author is long since gone. Would we then be charged to have a peek? Would scientist have had to pay by the hour to study it? I think that the whole situation should be looked at more carefully. At least take a moment.
These are the things I think about late at night. It's 4 am.
Masks:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gnuckx/4701308889/in/set-72157624276908530/
Tree: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rubyblossom/sets/
Background photo: I had it laying around
© 2010 NeonSun Studios
Next time: How to protect your artwork
My housekeeping is done. Now everything is sorted nicely into colour coded folders in alphabetical order. There are a few strays. I feel like posting a note under my picture asking if anyone owns that graphic. Something like, "If this is your snip, feel free to send me a terse, yet polite email and I'll give you credit".
Sometimes I wonder about copyright. If you find an old photo at a garage sale, do you have the right to copyright it? Some of those people could be alive. I often wonder about those faces. Would that charming little child who may be in their 80's now, really be happy about a cherished memory being Zettied? Don't they own their own image?
Another thing I saw tonight was a site that sold rubberstamps claimed that the images on the stamps are copyrighted. It stated that anything made with the stamp could not be sold as it was copyrighted. Is this going too far? If I put a sticker on my work I don't have to thank the sticker company.
It is something to think about. Copyrighting old images that belong to other people or, are already published just seems wrong. When people do that we lose track of who actually created the image or its origins. What if someone copyrighted the Rosetta Stone? After all the author is long since gone. Would we then be charged to have a peek? Would scientist have had to pay by the hour to study it? I think that the whole situation should be looked at more carefully. At least take a moment.
These are the things I think about late at night. It's 4 am.
Masks:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gnuckx/4701308889/in/set-72157624276908530/
Tree: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rubyblossom/sets/
Background photo: I had it laying around
© 2010 NeonSun Studios
Next time: How to protect your artwork
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






